August 25, 2011 6:33 AM - Open Thread
When: August 25th, 6:30pm
Where: 308 Flatbush Avenue
What: Do you really have to ask?
CobbleSnaps Productions proudly presents our annual End of Summer Shindig! We'll be at Ocean's 8 located at 308 Flatbush Avenue in Park Slope, Brooklyn (near the corner of 7th Avenue).
Ocean's 8 has numerous pool tables, 2 bowling lanes, air hockey tables, ping-pong tables, a bar (of course!) and a kitchen that serves food! (The onion rings are FABULOUS!) For more information about Ocean's 8 and to see pictures of the space, visit their website at http://www.oceans8atbrownstone.com/index-1.html
No excuses will be accepted...get yer booty on down to Ocean's 8 on August 25th from 6:30pm until whenever and party with all the gang! We always love to meet new people and familiar faces are always a pleasure, too. Hope to see you all there!
Ocean's 8 is located at 308 Flatbush Avenue. Take the B or Q train to the "7th Avenue" stop and use the exit that is marked "7th Ave and Flatbush." The main entrance to Ocean's 8 is right outside this stop. You can also take the 2/3 to either Bergen Street or Grand Army Plaza. For the bus riders, take the B67 to the corner of Flatbush Avenue and 7th Avenue, or the B41 to Flatbush Avenue and Park Place. (map - http://tinyurl.com/3vacg9s) (IF YOU TAKE THE B41, DO NOT, WE REPEAT DO NOT TAKE THE B41'LIMITED'. TAKE THE REGULAR B41)
**THIS IS AN OFFICIAL COBBLESNAPS PRODUCTION. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED AND ENFORCED BY CATS WITH SUPER SHARP CLAWS.**
So is it "tremor" envy or "trembler" envy?
August 23, 2011 9:18 PM - Open Thread
- gay smurf hoodlum
Since Snappy is so hesistant to start a full-fledged sex advice column, I figure i'll do it.
As many of you know I've been an ardent pracitioner of auto-sexuality for quite some time now; this is a lifestyle choice, NOT because I cant go out and hook up with people. There's tons of ho-bags out there, especially in the gay world, so again I repeat: this is a CHOICE!
I have a degree in Psychology from the prestigious Rutgers University in New Jersey so it's not like i don't know what im talking about, okay? About time I do something worthwhile with my psychology degree.
So bring on the questions!!!! nothing is too vile or base to ask, just ask!!! I ask questions all the time that most people would be too embarrassed to ask.
And it's not like im a virgin or anything, hells duh, i HAVE had sex before! I've also seen thousands of hours of porno in my life of all kinds so I can offer good solid down home advice.
Don't be shy, ask Butterfly!
ON GOVERNMENT OVER-REACH: This
should be, rather obviously, filed under the heading, “You
Can’t Make This Stuff Up,” but a kind young lady… Ms.
Schyler Capo, of northern Virginia, saved a baby
woodpecker from the jaws of a neighborhood cat
recently. Having saved the young bird, she took it home
to nurse it back to health before returning it to the wild. A
federal bird and wildlife official, having heard of her good
deed did what any self-respecting government official
would do under the circumstance: he fined her….
$525!!!... for transporting an endangered species.
Actually, to be fair, the official fined young Ms. Capo’s
mother, but that seems hardly to soften the stupidity of
This is the very heart of the problem with government
these days: it is too intrusive; it is too “Big Brother-y” and
it is “stoopid” beyond belief. But such is what the Left
creates when it allows government to become so large
and so intrusive that it errs in manners such as this.
To start this series, I thought I’d define a legal term and discuss how it affects the everyday person dealing with a lawsuit. I will also discuss an important part of small claims cases in New York City courts. With apologies to Sesame Street and CTW, today’s word is:
What the heck does that mean? Well, res judicata is Latin for “the thing has been judged.” When used in a courtroom setting, it effectively means that the subject of the lawsuit currently before the court was already dealt with in a prior lawsuit and the current lawsuit should not proceed. An example of res judicata in operation:
Lucy accuses Anna of breaking her stereo and wants Anna to pay for a new one. Lucy files a lawsuit against Anna in Small Claims Court in Brooklyn. The judge or arbitrator decides that Lucy does not have enough proof to show that Anna broke the stereo. Lucy loses her lawsuit. Unsatisfied, Lucy again files a lawsuit against Anna for the cost of her stereo. This time, Lucy files her lawsuit in Small Claims Court in Manhattan. On the appointed court date, Anna complains to the judge or arbitrator that Lucy already sued her for this very same reason in Brooklyn. Anna tells the judge or arbitrator that the case in Brooklyn was decided and Lucy lost. The judge or arbitrator finds in favor of Anna and dismisses Lucy’s claim. Not because s/he feels that Anna did not break Lucy’s stereo, but because of res judicata. The issue of Lucy’s broken stereo, as it relates to Anna, has already been decided by another court and will not be re-litigated.
Note that above, I said “judge or arbitrator.” In Small Claims Court, either an arbitrator or a judge may hear your claim. Both are legal professionals well versed in the applicable laws, but choosing one or the other will make a difference in your case, particularly your rights after the case is over. If you agree to have your case heard by an arbitrator, you must remember that the arbitrator’s decision cannot be appealed. Both parties must agree to have the case heard by an arbitrator. If you have your case heard by a judge, you can appeal his/her decision. If one or more parties to a small claims lawsuit do not agree to have the case heard by an arbitrator, it will have to be heard by a judge.
So, let’s go back to Lucy and Anna. If an arbitrator adjudicated Lucy’s case, she would be precluded by res judicata from re-litigating the case against Anna. If, however, a judge heard the case, Lucy would not need to file a new case and risk having it dismissed due to res judicata. Instead, she would simply file an appeal.
That being said, why would parties ever agree to have their case heard by an arbitrator instead of a judge? The most common reason arbitrators are chosen is that there are simply more of them available for hearing small claims cases. If, on the appointed court date, the parties insist that a judge hear their case, they may have to wait several days, possibly even weeks, before the case is heard. In some cases, the parties may be so sure of their case that they don’t foresee losing and possibly needing to appeal. Only you (or an attorney you personally consult) can make the decision about seeing an arbitrator or a judge. Be sure to think through your options and be sure you are making an informed decision.
In the next installment, I’ll discuss the standard of proof for civil cases, including small claims cases, and the standard of appeal. Until next time, stay legal!
*note that in criminal proceedings, res judicata is better known as ‘double jeopardy.’
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS ARTICLE AND ON THIS WEBSITE IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER. NO RECIPIENTS OF CONTENT FROM THIS SITE SHOULD ACT OR REFRAIN FROM ACTING ON THE BASIS OF ANY CONTENT INCLUDED IN THE ARTICLE OR THE SITE WITHOUT SEEKING THE APPROPRIATE LEGAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVICE ON THE PARTICULAR FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AT ISSUE FROM AN ATTORNEY LICENSED IN THE RECIPIENT'S STATE. THE CONTENT OF THIS ARTICLE AND WEEBSITE CONTAINS GENERAL INFORMATION AND MAY NOT REFLECT CURRENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS, VERDICTS OR SETTLEMENTS. THE AUTHOR AND THE WEBSITE OWNERS/OPERATORS EXPRESSLY DISCLAIM ALL LIABILITY IN RESPECT TO ACTIONS TAKEN OR NOT TAKEN BASED ON ANY OR ALL THE CONTENTS OF THIS ARTICLE AND WEBSITE. THE ARTICLES DO NOT REFLECT THE OPINIONS OF THE OWNERS/OPERATORS OF THIS WEBSITE. ANY MATERIALS INCORPORATED FROM OTHER WEBSITES OR LINKS TO OTHER WEBSITES ARE NOT NECESSARILY SPONSORED, ENDORSED OR OTHERWISE APPROVED OF BY THE OWNERS/OPERATORS OF THIS WEBSITE OR THE ARTICLE’S AUTHOR. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT INTENDED TO CREATE AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A LAWYER-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP WITH THE READER.
THIS ARTICLE IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT.
August 22, 2011 6:44 AM - Open Thread
August 20, 2011 10:26 PM - Open Thread
In this book, Jennifer Baszile tells the story of her life growing up in a Southern California suburb. As is evident from the title, Baszile’s family is one of very few black families in the area. Her parents moved there so that she and her older sister could have access to a better education and better opportunities.
From the very beginning, I truly felt the tension as Baszile describes the hatred aimed at her family by anonymous people in the neighborhood – spray painting racial epithets on their driveway and painting a cherub’s face black. Baszile and her father spend hours scrubbing away at the cherub, and throughout the book I sensed that Baszile was trying to scrub away the pain she feels for not being like the other kids at school. From her disappointment in realizing that makeup is made for white faces to longing to get a lye relaxer so that her hair will blow in the breeze, Baszile related a tale of hurt, but also one of strength. She doesn’t desire to be white. Instead, she has a strong sense of pride in her heritage. She is persistent in asking her parents about their life experience growing up and that of extended family. She longs for stories of strong black women and relishes learning about Harriet Tubman and Rosa Parks. But still, being an ‘only’ is tiring for Baszile. When slavery is taught in school, all the kids turn to look at her. They want to know if her parents were slaves. What is it like? How did they get free? It’s times like these that Baszile gets angry.
As if the pressure of being the token black girl in school weren’t enough, Baszile feels pressure from her parents as well. On a cruise one summer, Baszile and her sister are taken to task by their parents. Their parents noticed that the girls had not made friends with the black kids on board. Outraged, Baszile’s parents lock she and her sister out of their cabin for the day and tell them they cannot come back until they have learned the names of all the black kids on the ship and something notable about them. It turns out that Baszile’s parents feared that growing up in a white neighborhood had somehow made them ‘lose their blackness.’
This book made me quite introspective. Each time I lay the book down, I found myself flipping through the mental pages of my own youth, comparing and contrasting experiences. I’d call my mother, asking her things like if she had fears about ‘maintaining blackness’’ in a white neighborhood once we moved from Chicago. I always appreciate a book that can make me think, and this one is no exception.
Baszile’s writing flows beautifully, keeping you glued to the pages, not wanting to put the book down. However, near the end, the writing feels rushed and tired. It’s almost as if Baszile had toiled for years writing this book and once she neared the end, she was too tired to put any real effort into an ending. Things about her father are suddenly sprung on the reader without having any clue or background as to how such things came about. I felt like I was jolted out of the flow of a good story and suddenly thrust into the mind of someone in a near manic state. Overall, it is still a good read.
Rating: 4/5 stars
August 20, 2011 7:10 AM - Open Thread
August 19, 2011 6:58 AM - Open Thread
Interestingly, I have seen reference to Jarndyce vs. Jarndyce two days in a row by seperate commentators; yesterday by the esteemed Slopefarm, Esq. and this morning by a British chap who writes a daily market commentary.